Have you ever noticed that “Jen” tends to operate on a certain set of assumptions, axioms, if you will, but I don’t want to get too, shall we say, sophist here.
When you observe “Jen,” and her used-to-be TransTruthTeller, there’s always something just a bit amiss. With TransTruthTeller, it’s quite apparent. In fact, it being incredibly apparent is part of the charm of the sock puppet account. How else would someone who’s decidedly not an actual trans woman come across other than sometimes not like an actual trans woman?
I always found it odd that TransTruthTeller would deride me, of all people, as a queer person when I would argue with bigoted trolls on Twitter. And we’re talking people who would post things like “racism doesn’t exist.” Like, actual racists, Nazi-sympathizers, and people who think furries should be shot because all gays (we know it’s code guys for queer people) are pedophiles, of course!
She had, you could say, zero empathy for any cause I might temporarily take up in relation to queer existence. She would chime in with things like, “That poor bear!” for example when I was figuratively thrown to the bear in the woods. She’d mock me, my intelligence, and whatever else with little quips, mostly focusing on (as far as I can remember) my mental stability. I have pretty much every post TransTruthTeller made on Twitter up until a certain date, so, this will be shown in detail.
Come to think of it… now that I think about it… TransTruthTeller would usually show up in the midst of a ‘debate’ I was having on Twitter, but only after Liana became aware of it. Huh.
It was very odd for a trans woman to be mocking the mental stability of a gay person given that one of the beliefs/stereotypes about trans women is that they are mentally unstable. Of course, pointing this out to Liana only gave back “she’s obviously lying about who she is.”
Well, yes.
And, so, here we are with “Jen.”
Per the previous post, I’ve noted how “Jen” had taken to blocking and cropping out our names and identities when sharing our very own screenshots, or her screenshots of our posts, etc. I’ve noted how I’ve been banned from “Jen’s” Tumblr, had a row with this figurative person on BlueSky, was promptly dismissed (because that’s the most effective angle to go after a Borderli… wait a second), and do not communicate with her.
I’ve even documented, both here and on Reddit, how “Jen” took on a two week crusade to get an image she ripped off my site, edited, and reposted onto Tumblr because I kept getting it taken down, only for the moment I publicly said I’d give up, for Liana, in the very next video I believe, announce that “Jen” and I (the ‘stalker’s blog’ and I) just MUST be in cahoots despite neither of us ever talking kindly to each other.
You can also see, on Medium, I don’t take too kindly to TransTruthTeller either.
It’s all sooooo…. just…. very much like something….
And so we see here, once again.
You know how Liana likes to leverage mental health stigma no matter how much she tries to redefine it into something other than what it is? How her BIG go-to with me from the get-go was “… because of the growing mental health [instability] of the spouse of a member of the team this led to repeated missed …” (the official transcript says “and stability,” which, implies the same thing)? How my alleged unstable-ness was dangerous because it was a fundamental unreconciled and unacknowledged lack of impulse control that… was completely manufactured? All that?
On Jan 8th, 2015 “Jen” posted:
Note that the complaint here is that “drama llama-ing.” There’s ‘too much drama.’ This should sound familiar to anyone with a personality disorder.
On the same day, “Jen” also posts,
Liana K repeatedly threatens people she doesn’t like with lawsuits, as an intimidation tactic.
Liana K is a professional victim – she is always being harassed or wronged by someone. People who are blinded by her fake innocence are often called to speak up on her behalf, and don’t realize how badly they are being manipulated.
Yeah, yeah, yeah… but wait… how does “Jen,” as far back as 2015 (that’s 11 years) know this with such certainty when the whole thing with Emily Schooley appears to have only started going down publicly on November 6, 2014? How would someone know this kind of pattern with just, such certainty in such a short amount of time? Word of mouth, perhaps?
Oh, I like this one, and from now on, this is what I’ll be mainly focusing on:
Oh… the next one IS of interest. It’s quite peculiar. Even Liana themselves said that elements of TransTruthTeller’s stories *were* true, but were distorted and mish-mashed. Huh.
But, “Jen” must just be *really* connected to be so certain about so many things on the same day mind you.
GAY, you say? So very weird, so very certain, and. so. very. pattern. 11 years later, and nothing. has. changed. … allegedly. Did the phone call sound something like this? THIS IS STILL THE SAME DAY MIND YOU.
I remind you that, according to Lianaganda, everything this account has ever posted is a complete lie.
This is… fodder? Like, these are shared almost as if they are weaknesses of charac… mmm…
Also… how does “Jen” know this with such certainty? Did she go to high school with Liana? You might think that, but later posts reveal that Liana themselves has to claim they said things IN high school for it to be featured. Anonymity perhaps? You tell me!
And, this is only two days later guys.
What’s interesting about this one is that, I believe thizshizisbananas IS Emily Schooley, as there is another reply post that reads like an earnest person with an earnest defense, one *I’D* write, and… not liana-k-truth. See, in Lianaganda, liana-k-truth IS Emily Schooley, but, yeah, no.
Alleged Emily’s post has an interesting nugget: Liana claims Emily started a Twitter, and wouldn’t you know it, it says all sorts of nasty things to all of Emily’s friends, and Emily is… dun dun dun further ostracized.
But, besides that, notice the turn here.
Here liana-k-truth, the alleged “Jen,” mocks Liana’s alleged trauma, uses Twitter posts to denounce a “victim” for not being a good enough of a victim, citing Twitter posts as evidence of not being traumatized…
Remember that Liana Kerzner, by her own admission, has PTSD and was traumatized, so, here’s “Jen” once again shaming mental illness.
Huh.
At least this one is 15 days later.
I encourage you to, just, for the fun of it, read the second sentence in Liana’s voice.
Note the language in this one. Liana isn’t “pulling this kind of behaviour on people.” Oh no, “Liana is allowed to pull [this kind of behavior] on others” (emphasis mine)
Because… what, the interpersonal police are gonna show up? Because people don’t react negatively to it?
Like, what kind of one-step-back language is this?
I know that I’ve written about the use of the word “allowed” quite a bit in the last 18 months.
At one point Liana Kerzner noted that if my husband could “accuse” her of “deliberate cruelty” then that means it’s something he thinks is a thing he might do himself. Remember that when you read about the pretend stalkers.
This… this pretending thing. Is it sort of like how Liana has been implying, getting closer and closer and closer to *almost* saying it, that my entire disability and disorder isn’t actually a disorder and just.. an excuse I make up? Except, when I need to be dangerous, it is a disorder again, but it needs it’s own special classification of BPD and… fuck man.
I don’t have a date or URL for this one at the moment (but I do have it archived), but oh, boy, does it just *ring*
One day, I asked Liana if she was worried that TransTruthTeller would ever produce any sort of e-mail evidence of any kind whatsoever, and almost immediately with such swiftness I told Pablo that he should tell Liana to maybe it cool it a bit with, “She’s lying.” I’d never seen her respond so fast.
Huh.
Also, wasn’t it Liana that weirdly focused on how much traction we were allegedly not getting with her name, and that we also, simultaneously, got the most attention in our entire lives by using her name, and her moderator determined that we can’t sue anyone for anything because we aren’t public figures and… fuck man.
You know… there could be a very rational explanation as to why it was so easy for “Jen” to call it so accurately years ago… dang, in January, AGAIN?
Anyways, anyone notice the wording in this one? The focus? It’s on “people with poor boundaries” rather than say, mental health struggles. It’s worded in a way that makes it sound like it’s almost their fault because they didn’t bother to have better boundaries.
Huh.
So, here we go. Narcissist = bad, here. Remember the week *before* I believe Liana decided she needed to trash Novelty Factor Hosting with the last shred of possible control she could muster as a disgruntled former customer? When she was posting all that stuff about narcissism with little allusions here and there, reacting to what I was posting, and even trying to advocate for an “in-between” diagnoses so people could differentiate between the “good” BPD folk and the “terrible person” BPD folk?
Yeah.
Also, note the use of misogyny. We’ll come back to that.
Note here what liana-k-truth, the alleged “Jen,” takes as Liana “hating women.”
“… logging her histrionic, narcissistic complaints …”
Crazy, “psychotic,” “histrionic,” “narcissistic,” “DARVO,” “misogynist” …
Crazy/unstable and misogynist… the two worst things you could possibly be…
“blatant narcissistic defamation”
What a way to describe defamation!
“Paranoid delusions” “DARVOing”
Liana Kerzner has said, multiple times now, that, paraphrased, “there is delusional thinking at work here…” and she’s accused us of DARVOing, as well as implied narcissism, described my writing as a “screed.” She’s mocked my “unstable” brain as not being able to discern dates in my paranoia.
I mean…
January… again. Ha, even the 10th, where we started! Literally 10 years later, and we’ve got…
Unstable and misogynist. The two worst things you could be, unstable and misogynist.
“Someone this mentally unstable should not … be hosting public events.”
“… she wants to lash out against another woman. … Liana showed her narcissistic misogyny …”
So… to “Jen,” opposing, criticizing, or ‘lashing out’ at another woman is a sign of… *checks notes* misogyny.
Sound familiar? Or is it that, I remind you, *I’m* unstable and misogynist?
I’m not gonna screencap this one, (January 12, 2025) it’s long. But, I’ll run it through.
These three screenshots are important:
This is what “Jen” has to say about them, “^ Liana and her Discord friends openly trashing Gen Z, LGBT+ youth, and sharing some casual misogyny.”
To “Jen” these comments ARE misogynistic. Criticizing women, doing something to irritate a woman, talking about how a woman will get old (which Liana complains about a lot) IS misogynist just by its nature. Having a critical take on tender queers is trashing LGBT+ youth, or complaining about a younger generation is trashing Gen Z.
Huh. This logic, and linguistic turn, seem familiar.
“Jen” describes this as “Liana and co purposely spreading fatphobia.”
Purposely? What does that mean? And apparently commenting on how someone is sensitive about her weight is tantamount to FATPHOBIA! Is that like GINGERPHOBIA?
“… other than her own narcissism, of course.”
Oh, what a terrible thing to be, an unstable narcissistic misogynist.
Another long one, (which, is a recent phenomenon it appears, and January 16th, no less… only uh, 6 days later). I wonder why they become so long these days… it’s a mystery!
Anyways, those three screenshots above?
They’re also evidence of fatshaming, a violation of privacy, and kinkshaming.
It’s like there’s a go-to template for accusations of wrongdoing, one that very much places the accuser in the social-justice victim role.
Hahaha. Well, we can’t. You blocked/banned us “Jen.” And oh yeah, we’ve requested, and oh yeah, you did it anyway, and oh yeah, upon securing it Liana immediately talked about it claiming “nefariousness” on my behalf. Yeah. Yeeeah. Oh, this one’s funny, because, to my remembrance, one of the reasons we were banned was because, get this, one of us (Maus or I) was… dun dun dun, misogynist somehow. I do remember that. I think it was because we… dun dun dun, used “abusive language” which was just me pointing out in my usual sarcastic fashion the absolute HYPERFOCUS this blog had on Emily Schooley (at the time).
Worst thing you can be is an unstable narcissistic misogynist you know. Especially if you’re a cisgender gay male cause then, well, then you might need to have the cops called on you, just like the first guy, ELEVEN YEARS AGO.
Folks. This is clearly someone who doesn’t change their pattern. They have a go-to, and it’s so go-to the literal same events happen again eleven years later, just change identities. And you are going to venture to tell me that it just so happens that, apparently, the worst thing Liana Kerzner could be to “Jen” is an unstable narcissistic misogynist who is fatphobic? It’s just a coincidence that, apparently, that’s the worst thing *I* could also be?
Let’s continue, ’cause I’m doing this quick (cause I gotta go to bed)
“toxic” “narcissist”
Oh, just a note, MAUS AND I broke the story of her *actually* sharing private client information, *actually* calling the cops, and *actually* well… I guess we’ll see.
Not “Jen,” who, at this point, is simply chasing our coattails, because, what else is she going to do?
So much for Emily Schooley.
I have to tell you, the only place I ever actually *read* “rules for thee, but not for me” on the Internet with any degree of it being normal was Kiwi Farms when I was looking to see what they were saying about me. Just sayin’
Kiwi Farms, by the way, isn’t.
This is the post, right here, and the screenshot that I had Tumblr remove *twice.* Placing it on imgur doesn’t make it fair use sweaty. You sound like someone who lacks just enough legal knowledge to think not naming someone protects them from being sued.
But, this image. This one. Note how “Jen” blocks out my name? And crops and edits it? I mean, it’s here. In the exchange. It’s IN that post (or should be!)
As soon as I posted on socials that I gave up, Liana Kerzner talked about it in a video. It might’ve been Patreon, it might’ve been YouTube, that parts hazy, but the data won’t lie.
It’s all just so…. I don’t know, but I do know the worst thing you can possibly be to “Jen” is an unstable narcissistic misogynist.
You know what’s really weird about this post? What stands out to me?
You’d think it’d be the fact that “Jen” parrots the exact same faulty wording Mitchell Jura himself used when talking about me publishing the information Liana sent me. The thing is, I published that *after* “falling out” with Liana, so, Liana Kerzner didn’t “use” me for shit. At least, not the way they make it sound.
But it’s actually not that.
It’s the last paragraph.
You see, Liana’s counsel, at one point, Mark Bourrie, cited the kind of language present in that last paragraph as the kind of language we needed to take down NAOWH! He also stated that it’s a myth that posts can’t be tracked down on the Internet. And, supposedly, given all its insider knowledge and the admission (as I understand it) that this person was once close to the Kerzner’s in some way shape or form, you got someone in Canada “scared” to share their name. Put those three things together and you got…
That’s right! A litigious silencing lawsuit!
And yet…
And yet.
…
It’s.
Just.
All.
So…
ANNOYING.