Source: at://did:plc:v2j2g5pdghrwazhbw6gvxtdp/app.bsky.feed.post/3lqbitwbeqg2w
One last thing to address today, having come back.
Audrey ( bsky.app/profile/did:… ) posted this while I was temp banned due to "harassment."
It is a prime example of a couple manipulations: lying by omission, shifting blame or context, vilifying, and all things along those lines.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.179 / 3lqbitwbeqg2w
I explain in to-the-point detail:
Audrey likes to do this kind of thing in almost *every* direct and indirect interaction she has had with me.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.180 / 3lqbitxg6hw2w
She isn't including some very important details as part of her and her girlfriend's (Saige Alexis) efforts to 'erase' *my* 'context' (something Saige complained about me).
2025-05-29 00:51:47.181 / 3lqbityo3sw2w
For anyone wondering, since her handle is deemed invalid, you can access her profile here with this: bsky.app/profile/did:…
I suspect that Saige altered her required DNS entries in an attempt for me to not be able to have anyone tag her, or at least, not me.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.182 / 3lqbityo4s62w
tl;dr version: what she isn't mentioning is that I have a specific grievance with them after they treated me and my husband *horribly* and with ableist, sexist, and racist *disdain* because I wouldn't bend over backwards to meet their demands.
In essence: I said 'no' and they can't accept it.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.183 / 3lqbityo5rg2w
I'm not 'lumping' them in with my beef. I'm not saying they are responsible for Poppy, or my beef with Liana. I've never 'dragged' them into anything. They manufactured their own beef with me through their despicably indulgent behavior, insisting they "knew" everything about my situation.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.184 / 3lqbityo5rh2w
Spoiler: They did not. But that *does* mean that people are talking about in private conversations, and it's obviously very biased and inaccurate.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.185 / 3lqbityo5ri2w
I don't need to tag anyone anymore, so I won't. There you go. It was a big nothing win though. Hope you're happy having achieved nothing of significance. Doesn't stop me from speaking my mind in my online channels.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.186 / 3lqbityo5rj2w
Audrey (and even Saige in her 'address') doesn't, and don't, mention the following factual information of which I have already provided a response and evidence, such as the quoted-very-long-thread.
More quote-posts in a separate reply-branch to this post.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.187 / 3lqbityo5rk2w
Saige asked why I put her in this list:
2025-05-29 00:51:47.188 / 3lqbityo6qs2w
I responded:
2025-05-29 00:51:47.189 / 3lqbityqlvk2w
I think that Saige and Audrey didn't like that answer: "I don't focus on having an affirming 'community,' positive things, humor, or whatever I'm supposed to focus on. …
2025-05-29 00:51:47.190 / 3lqbiu7uwk22w
… But it *is* in various form or fashion at one time or another like the timelines of the individuals I've listed, including yours. That's the only way I'm lumping you in with anyone else."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.191 / 3lqbiu7uwk32w
There it is, right there, "That's the only way I'm lumping you in with anyone else."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.192 / 3lqbiu7uxjd2w
Saige and Audrey insisted on several things from there on out without budging an inch: that I was comparing Saige's online behavior to Poppy's (I wasn't then, I came to do so after this because of this),
2025-05-29 00:51:47.193 / 3lqbiu7uxje2w
that I was unjustly harming Saige somehow by coercing her into viewing my post (because I tagged her), then not respecting her demand I don't talk about her, and that my husband traumatized her.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.194 / 3lqbiu7uxjf2w
This ignores that *she* chose to read it, *she* chose to reply, *she* chose to pursue the ridiculous argument, *she's* the one that decided to drag it out, piquing my interest with her demands and awful treatment to the point I now have a personal criticism of her and her girlfriend.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.195 / 3lqbiu7uxjg2w
How did my husband traumatize her? Saige invented, out of thin air, an interpretation of what I was writing I didn't even imagine: that I was *comparing* my 'trauma' and victimization at Poppy's hands with hers.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.196 / 3lqbiu7uxjh2w
I was not. Maus was not. Neither of us were. We kept stating that, which only appeared to further agitate Saige and Audrey. I believe the ploy was to belittle whatever was going on with me, make themselves the most important people in the conversation, and get their way.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.197 / 3lqbiu7uyip2w
But, that doesn't work with me, and *I* said 'no,' and here we are.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.198 / 3lqbiu7uyiq2w
In this entire very dramatic process (where Saige trotted out Cerise, her alter, to indicate she was in crisis, because I guess disappearing for 2 weeks would be worse) it became clear that, judging by everything she was writing,
2025-05-29 00:51:47.199 / 3lqbiu7uyir2w
Saige *needed* desperately to be the biggest most important victim to have 'control' over some narrative I don't even want or consider myself part of. I don't do groups.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.200 / 3lqbiu7uyis2w
We told her, "Okay, go ahead, do that, but don't diminish whatever the fuck's going on with us because you insist I'm comparing our suffering. We *never* did that. *You* did that."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.201 / 3lqbiu7uyit2w
After Saige/Cerise posted sexist, and then straight-up racist, assertions to a third-world Ecuadorian man (towards me), and Audrey posted incredibly ableist retorts, all culminating in Saige breaking her own opsec and revealing something she didn't want to reveal,
2025-05-29 00:51:47.202 / 3lqbiu7uyiu2w
it rapidly devolved into demands that I don't contact them (fine), don't tag them, never mention them again, (maybe even delete it all), and "leave them alone," because they are perpetual victims of everyone including my awful deranged manic comparisons (that I never made, they did).
2025-05-29 00:51:47.203 / 3lqbiu7uyiv2w
This was wrapped up, just as I had outlined in my first response, in a vague threat of legal action (a protection order of some kind, as Saige would 'explore' her options) as well as a vague death threat (Audrey wrote she was, "*DEADLY* serious," to which I wrote, "Are you going to shoot me?"
2025-05-29 00:51:47.204 / 3lqbiu7uyiw2w
Unacceptable.
And *I* was the one suspended for 72 hours due to "harassment." They've been fine.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.205 / 3lqbiu7uzi62w
This was play by play, post by post, *exactly* the way Poppy had 'engaged' with me, the way Liana had talked to me, sans actual legal threats, and now Audrey and Saige, despite insisting they *don't.* That's not the new *context,* and I was erasing it.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.206 / 3lqbiu7uzi72w
And my response? I asserted my right to write what I want, and told them, and everyone else, "You're an adult. If you want to file, then file. Do whatever you feel necessary. Likewise, I'll challenge it as much as necessary."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.207 / 3lqbiu7uzia2w
I haven't received any notices. I haven't had any authorities contact me. I haven't had any surveillance that I know of. I haven't had any check-ins… and I'm concerned, I don't know what's taking so long since I'm so terrible and they are in so much danger, apparently.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.208 / 3lqbiu7uzib2w
And then, they decided that angle wasn't working, so they reverted to, "Social media isn't public! In fact, public spaces aren't public! Everything I determine to be private is private, on any whim or feeling I have, especially being unsafe."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.209 / 3lqbiu7uzic2w
But you *can't be publicly private, or privately public.* What the heck does that mean? Well, I explored that and moved on.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.210 / 3lqbiu7uzid2w
But, round and round and round and round we go:
2025-05-29 00:51:47.211 / 3lqbiu7v2hl2w
They are stuck in a fantasy.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.212 / 3lqbiuam5pt2w
It *doesn't* erase the right you have to *personal privacy* because it's public. What it being public means is this: whatever you put out there, into the public, *isn't* personally private, because it's now public.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.213 / 3lqbiuam5pu2w
*You* put it there. *You* made it public, and then decide you want to restrict it somehow when it becomes inconvenient, otherwise you enjoy your audience just fine.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.214 / 3lqbiuam5pv2w
So which is it? Is it public and you have an audience you put on a show for? Or is it private, and thus, people have to seek it out and somehow leak it *to the public*?
2025-05-29 00:51:47.215 / 3lqbiuam5pw2w
If it's so *personally private* then, who are you talking to or writing for when you write large *public* pieces meant to be read *by the public* about leaving The SZP Foundation?
2025-05-29 00:51:47.216 / 3lqbiuam5px2w
Who are you addressing when you write your faulty and self-serving statement 'addressing' what happened? The public? As in, anyone, *but* apparently me? Well, when you can fit everyone in your living room, let me know, otherwise, it's the public.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.217 / 3lqbiuam5py2w
They have nothing but these tired whim-worshiping stances that *sound* okay, kinda, but are horrible and short-sighted. They don't have anything else or anything new. They don't have an argument.
2025-05-29 00:51:47.218 / 3lqbiuam5pz2w
They wont' make an argument. The refuse to address what I say, as per the modus operandi of everyone involved. They won't counter. They won't try to refine their argument. They won't say how I'm wrong.
Instead, following in Poppy, and then Liana's footsteps they use mental health stigma:
2025-05-29 00:51:47.219 / 3lqbiuam6pb2w
Any coherent thing I say, even when I'm *imitating Liana* point by point, even line by line, is completely incomprehensible because I'm "unhinged."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.220 / 3lqbiuam6pc2w
I'm always nuts unless I'm doing what people want me to do. Normativity much?
I'll quote Liana and say, "Personal responsibility is a thing."
2025-05-29 00:51:47.221 / 3lqbiuam6pd2w
They are demanding that I fuck off and leave *them* out of the beef I have *with them.* A very specific one that revolves around what *they did* and tried to erase. It don't work like that, and is double-speak for "just stop talking about us entirely or else."
2025-05-29 00:56:49.163 / 3lqbj4wb6zd2w
Funny enough, I've already moved on from what they did to me, and how horribly they acted. I don't really care anymore, I already resolved it, stating a case and a side far more damning and effective than of the overly-wrought intellectual faffing about they've done.
2025-05-29 00:56:49.164 / 3lqbj4wjcrt2w
In my opinion, that's why they want it deleted; that's why they want my account gone. It's not a good look.
The more they keep bringing it up or vague-booking about me, like Saige's latest Skeet may be doing (I don't now, and it doesn't matter), I'll respond to it, on my timeline, away from them.
2025-05-29 00:56:49.165 / 3lqbj4wjdr32w
And, hahaha, they post saying "we never cared if you talk about 'them'" as if that means anything.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.808 / 3lqbjyf7jyd2w
That's not what he wrote, nor what he cares about. She must've never taken care to notice that we don't give a fuck whether she cares or not, it's not a negotiation, she has no influence here.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.809 / 3lqbjyfeo2d2w
We're not appealing for her permission, omg, like, haha, she could give any. The self-importance of these people!
2025-05-29 01:12:10.810 / 3lqbjyfeo2e2w
Also, how the fuck am I entitled? I'm really curious. I really want to know. Entitled to what? To saying 'no,' I'm not going to do that, and I don't have to do that? To saying 'no' in general to whatever whim you imagine?
2025-05-29 01:12:10.811 / 3lqbjyfeo2f2w
I didn't try to entangle Vivid Corporation. I don't care about Vivid Corporation. I listed her in that list for the reason I gave. Simple. That was it.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.812 / 3lqbjyfeozn2w
Saige, front representative for Vivid Corporation, decided it was *all* these other things that she was either in charge of, more qualified for (to tell and handle *my* story), or a victim of (a comparison we never made).
2025-05-29 01:12:10.813 / 3lqbjyfeozo2w
You showed up and manufactured a spectacle, placing a target on your backs, and then blamed me so you could be victims of big bad Asher too. That's how *I* see it, if you see it that way.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.814 / 3lqbjyfeozp2w
I didn't "go nuclear." I posted a lot of words. *A lot* of words. As I do. If you "knew" all you knew, everything I did should've been expected, no big surprise, and yet… it was. It always is.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.815 / 3lqbjyfeozq2w
Maybe you guys *do not know* what you've been led to believe you know, and *that* should really tell you something. But, I'm sure it won't.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.816 / 3lqbjyfeozr2w
Also, I had no issue with you asking to not be tagged. I just didn't comply. I stated a reason, and was done. I said I understood what you were saying, and that I considered it, and I rejected the proposal, because that's what it was. It was a request turned demand, not a boundary.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.817 / 3lqbjyfepyz2w
*You* went 'nuclear' because I said no. Because I didn't just give in. I didn't play out the "social contract" you make up in your head that I never agreed to. I had *zero interest* in fighting with you, comparing anything to you, or even thinking about you, but I did after that!
2025-05-29 01:12:10.818 / 3lqbjyfepz22w
You tried so hard to make it a boundary by then manufacturing an entire spectacle that you could be victims of and write 'addresses' about to your publicly personally private audience.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.819 / 3lqbjyfepz32w
But, now, I'm not banned, because, ultimately, I'm *not* harassing anyone. Someone disagreed with you Audrey, I'm not 'unhinged' enough to merit banning.
2025-05-29 01:12:10.820 / 3lqbjyfepz42w
In fact, given the ban, people are actively attempting to
*silence* me, *and my friends.**I* think that's unhinged, much like announcing "wunk season" in a veiled threat of violence against a "a pedo" which were never my words.
2025-05-29 01:17:06.020 / 3lqbkb6qoxr2w
At the risk of whataboutism, I have to ask, what about that guy? Are you talking to that guy? Why are you the only one that said anything besides that account?
2025-05-29 01:17:06.021 / 3lqbkb6xawj2w
I can tell you, whether you listen or not, I am 99% certain he's not who he's telling you he is. I have pretty solid evidence I have not shared, because I don't 'live' online and I'm not stupid. However, there's *always* a chance I'm wrong.
2025-05-29 01:17:06.022 / 3lqbkb6xbvr2w
And *he does not like you.* He does not like liberals. He does not like gay people. He's a registered republican, a negligent caretaker, and wants to see all of us destroy each other or ourselves, which is why he triangulates as much as possible. He isn't your friend Audrey.
2025-05-29 01:17:06.023 / 3lqbkb6xbvs2w
I know him, personally, in real life. He's *none* of our friends. He's dangerous. He has and *will* manufacture whatever he feels necessary to feed his ego, and it's *possible, * he's at your virtual doorstep. And you want to focus so much on me.
What about him?
2025-05-29 01:17:06.024 / 3lqbkb6xbvt2w
ATProto root record: 3lqbitwbeqg2w