I broke new ground when I announced that Liana Kerzner, “Peer Counselor” of It’s Not Therapy on Sauga 960am, breaks client confidentiality when the going gets rough and there’s a severing point of contention.
I did so starting with this BlueSky post:
at://did:plc:v2j2g5pdghrwazhbw6gvxtdp/app.bsky.feed.post/3l7ypchqclx2f
[EDIT: August 22, 2026: My BlueSky account(s) have been permanently suspended since May of 2025 because numerous individuals believe that me exposing the truth of shitty behavior in the same manner that they do so themselves was so atrocious and so “bad person territory” and so, well, critical of Liana Kerzner, isn’t fit to be published.
They’ll tell you, yop from the rooftops even, that it wasn’t about Kerzner in particular, but my allegedly transphobic and misogynist behavior, but, the evidentiary timeline shows that anyone being highly critical of Liana Kerzner by simply sharing links to videos criticizing them, including femme-presenting individuals, becomes a target for suspension.
The reason this site is up is because…
The reason this site is up is because Original Pursuits LLC’s hosting brand Novelty Factor Hosting, whose services you can purchase at my.noveltyfactor.com, and which is now owned by my husband Maus, isn’t responding to takedown requests, all based on the similar sentiments, since free speech is a thing in America (see below), and the liability cited doesn’t exist in their, or their counsel’s, opinion.
And Liana Kerzner, very much dissatisfied with this, spent two weeks disparaging the brand on BlueSky with falsehoods that have been addressed in detail (something they claim wasn’t ever done as I reacted with “ghoulish bitch” instead, oh what timing!), and which resulted in Kerzner calling the fucking cops on me… twice. Another ground was broke by my husband Maus when both of those calls to dispatch were published for everyone to hear, laying to rest the “rumor” that Kerzner would do so to people that displeased them (a “rumor,” I speculate, Kerzner started themselves).
That’s right, not only did Liana Kerzner whip herself into a frenzy as to offer a blackmail-like offer (something she accused me of when all terms were stripped from the table on my end a long time ago), but then, like a good Karen, she called the cops to intimidate me, as far as I personally see it. By the way, when she called she claimed that it was “the first time she’d done this,” (sure, Jan), AND, the local Fort Collins police, to their credit, determined her calls to be amounting to targeted harassment and told her to stop calling.
And what did they tell me? Unlike how Kerzner portrays the incident, it wasn’t, “Bad crazy person, stop bothering this woman,” to which I mewed, “I’m struggling and *wooorking* on it.”
What the cops *actually* said was that I could post whatever the fuck I wanted on social media as long as it wasn’t illegal, and that they did not consider what I was posting to be illegal by matter of not pursuing the harassment charges Kerzner first pondered *in the first call.*
And how did her audience appear to take it? Did they see it as the irrational flailings of a basement dwelling femcel intent on violently lashing out at an exceptionally bright entrepreneur /s? (I’m mocking the way she presents me, not calling her a femcel, christ.)
Of course not, even though, that places her, by her own metric, in “terrible person territory” with intentions to “menace.” But, you know, of course not, not the benevolent supreme leader!
That’s only reserved for disabled, at-risk, marginalized, completely “broken nobodies” ** with stigmatized disorders, not important “public figures” (Aileyn) with supposedly large followings (Aileyn) like Liana Kerzner.
** (Audrey, who is also a victim of not being a victim)
Liana Kerzner has described Novelty Factor’s lack of action a limitation upon *their* free speech with the phrase, “Free speech for them, [but] not for me I guess.”
I have yet to make sense of how a request that something be erased is a lack of free speech considering that they published that very phrase, but, you know, Kerzner logic doesn’t have to make sense, not even twice, fuck, not even thrice!
It’s the same logic that justified Liana’s sock-puppet husband Steven Joel Kerzner, of Ed the Sock fame, to offer up an explanation of unmanaged mental health condition for both shaming accusers and to strip his silent collaboration of culpability, describing his wife’s *decision* to not disclose it at the time as them thankfully “not throwing [him] under the bus,” while Liana, in their cancellation statement, did that very thing when it came to me (inaccurately), and thought it would garner fucking sympathy, so, who the fuck knows.
Also, notice all these fucking links? Yeah. Liana Kerzner provides none of these. Ever. And yet they complain that we don’t provide enough “actual” evidence, meaning, evidence she “approves” of, always alluding to some extraneous miasma of missing context… when, the factual timeline of data will show it doesn’t exist and this isn’t a cherry-picked constellation of pseudo-evidence. Yeah… no.]
Which started this thread:
Liana Kerzner Shares Private Client Information
Go! Take a look for yourself!
But, if you aren’t willing, or don’t believe me and won’t click because you’re in a cult, here’s more evidence:
The client in question was Mitchell Jura of British Columbia, a very autistic man who describes himself as “God’s Angriest Most Autistic Soldier” and living “Inside your mom or dad” on Twitter. He confirms that I, indeed, posted relevant and accurate information, in so many words, when he proceeded to “violate his own privacy”:
I’m quoting Liana Kerzner’s wording of someone choosing to disclose something in public, by the way. I couldn’t make that up if I tried.
Of course, the thing is that Liana didn’t “let” me do anything. But, he’s not entirely wrong.
I wouldn’t have been able to put that information out there if it hadn’t been for Liana Kerzner telling me said information. You may think that I’m a “terrible person,” but the fact remains that it was Liana Kerzner’s decision to inappropriately share a former client’s personal information with me that led to this outcome.
To put the focus *entirely* on me being a “terrible person,” is… well, pretty short-sighted guys. I can tell you that the reason I posted this, something I’ve stated the various times I posted it, is because any shred of secrecy, any hint of censorship, any drop of “minimizing harm,” and Liana Kerzner will skullfuck the hole like “a banshee who will never know love.”
Besides, I think it’s become clear to people not on the Kerzner Kool-Aid drip (though, I’m the Kool-Aid Man of discourse according to Giancarlo, and, well…) that I seriously don’t give two fucks if you think I’m a “terrible person.”
Succinct and clear: this isn’t me performing a weak “nuh-uh,” and then running off to cry. I really, really, really, really don’t care, and I’ve said why probably about a dozen times by now: the likelihood your judgment is made by the moral system I subscribe to is about 0.1%, and since that’s the one I subscribe to, I’m not going to care otherwise.
So, what you’ve got left is someone who repeatedy does this. The first victim uncovered was Mitchell Jura, but there have now been more: Song W. Eretson, Giant Enemy Crab, Moises, and, now, through trusted sources, Auron. That’s five fucking people guys. This is a pattern.
And if you don’t believe me? Well, Mitchell Jura, AKA @troll_patrol4 has some surprisingly wise words for you:
Mitchell has it a little wonky, because Liana didn’t dox him through me. See, besides not wanting to taint the evidence I am able to provide through needless censoring, Mitchell was a jackass to me. He posted some really ugly things about Liana that even now, I think are quite disgusting. And I’m the guy who called them a “ghoulish bitch!”
Here’s some prime examples of what Mitchell thinks of me:
So, it’s not much of a surprise to me that he might think someone ‘important’ like Liana (because Liana streams… I mean, look at the guy’s feed if you can stomach it) would have to tell me to do something like that, but they didn’t. Like Emily Schooley (who he ran off and supported, by the way, at the encouragement of… wouldn’t you know it? @LianaDoesntKare, trust me, click it), Jura doesn’t grant me any sort of agency or interests of my own.
To many of these people I don’t ever seem to actually exist, and yet, it appears to me that, to them, I do the most damage. It’s very odd behavior.
Anyway, here’s some more surprisingly wise words from @troll_patrol4:
https://x.com/troll_patrol4/status/1812938561379049688?s=20
NOTE: When I said we “debated” I meant we debated *other people* together. Also, I was under the impression at the time that Liana had helped us get to that party, when in reality, it was Maus who got us to that party. Wow!
The whole “play the victim” thing is because he was saying that, essentially, I can’t have any sort of consensual sex because I’m a mentally disabled person, and so anyone having sex with me would be taking advantage of a mentally ill man, among other things, and I took personal offense to them. Notice the playbook here though: insult, and then, point out how your insult landed in a way that invalidates the suffering, much like Liana Kerzner does. You can listen to this process yourself, in Liana’s video on Male Tears, which is the perfect example of how Liana divorces their actions from their effect by appearing to ‘analyze’ them. Of course, Kerzner’s analysis is that no one should ever make the mistake of thinking anyone has to do anything when a man cries, or, in Liana’s case, anyone cries, which… abusi— well, I’m getting ahead of myself.
And, of course, the embarrassing screenshot:
See, I would have LIKED to think. But, I wasn’t able to think that. I was very wrong.
Giancarlo once asked me when I was going to “eat crow” about Liana Kerzner on Twitter. I asked him to be more specific, and he wasn’t. I don’t “eat crow,” on generalities. And here, I only eat a little, because, it’s *really easy* to be “right about Liana” when they’ve already about-faced and “turned on” you, which, what I saw with Mitchell Jura in real-time, and then with me, is very much a thing.
Liana claims that they confronted me (us) about all sorts. But the fact remains, which I can very much prove in both online publication and in court, there was never any pushback regarding any of my actions right up until the “very ugly fight.” I probably should’ve realized that’s not a great sign, but, you know, I got comfortable, and I didn’t. Likewise, I’d like to take this moment to rail this home once more:
I never consented to curb any of my behavior or tone down anything I posted because of a project between them and my husband, being Song of Sparklemuffin.
Does that seem like something I’d submit to? Yeah… no.
And that’s why Liana Kerzner most likely never asked me. I can’t say for sure, unlike Kerzner attempts to do with me and every other “stalker/hater/critic/harasser… they all blur together, because, of everyone I’ve ever encountered, I have no firm idea what goes on in the mind of a “ghoulish bitch.”
I never consented to being a silent collaborator. I never consented to any kind of transparency into my life as any sort of team member of the project, not even by-proxy through Maus. I never consented to having my information revealed in public, however inaccurate, as some sort of transparency towards the project, and Maus never consented to having snippets of what he told them about his private life aired as a scapegoat for Liana’s failures (which, those weren’t the reasons for the delays). We never consented to anything that occurred during the cancellation video, or anything Kerzner said after.
And neither did Mitchell Jura.
And neither did Song, or Giant Enemy Crab, or Moises, or Auron, or…
What will it fucking take?
I know that I didn’t believe Mitchell, and obviously, I should have. Giancarlo Vanzzini (Hugo/Derrick/Mark?) once said that I can’t admit I’m wrong, but, that’s when he was so sure he knew me like the back of his jerking hand, when, that was most likely simply fueled by one or both of his impression of the toxic community, and/or what Liana dared to tell him. And man oh man, case in point, he was wrong as fuck.
Isn’t that amazing?
So many things in Liana’s “case” don’t make sense. They has several claims they can whip out on command depending on where Liana wants to appear to be standing that day. One of these is that Kerzner’s “harassers/stalkers/critics/ex-friends/… ugggh, “can’t admit to a mistake.”
Oh, no, Liana, we can. It was a mistake not to listen to Mitchell, no matter how much of an ass he was to me. It was a mistake to trust you. It was a mistake not to pay more attention. It was a mistake to tell you anything about my childhood… like, the only person involved in this who can’t seem to take criticism, a jab, an insult, an expletive, pushback, or anything negative…
Is fucking Liana Kerzner, as evidenced in all their recent *pearl clutching* that almost makes me laugh considering they once told me it “was impossible to overshare” with them, like a good predator, because they “interviewed porn stars.”
It really really should’ve reeked to me of that time I witnessed someone once say, “You can tell me, I’m an anthropologist,” instead of “I’m your friend.”
But it didn’t.
And here I am.
While we’re here, I’d like to draw your attention to a couple things:
See here that Liana purports that Mitchell was abused by his father, something I repeated as well based on the information Liana told me (which, should be just as valid, right?)
And see here, quoting from our final exchange:
Liana Kerzner: Your father was smart. Look where he ended up. Because he didn't pay enough attention to anything but the messages coming from the darkest pits in his own mind — 4:53 PMhttps://asherwolfstein.com/liana-kerzner-redlianaks-exchange-with-asher-wolfstein-september-2024/
Liana Kerzner: The only true thing you seem to have said is that you are your father's son. And your father didn't seem to give a shit about anything but his own seeming misery. — 5:50 PMhttps://asherwolfstein.com/liana-kerzner-redlianaks-exchange-with-asher-wolfstein-september-2024/
...https://asherwolfstein.com/liana-kerzner-redlianaks-exchange-with-asher-wolfstein-september-2024/
I told Pablo before I spoke to you that I was not going to coddle you. Because I think you've had a lot of that, and that's not respecting you as a person. You are more than just an extension of your father. You are your own person. You're not responsible for what he did and you don't have to save or redeem him. I don't think he'd want you to drive everyone away the way he did.
...
For the uninitiated, my father killed himself by not getting medical care and starving to death due to complications of cirrhosis.
Yeah.
And I don’t hold that against him. I’ve never felt responsible for something someone else did, ever. Do I seem like I would be? I spoke to Liana about having this sense, at times, when I’d speak of my dreams that it was like I was trying to offer Scott some kind of save from… whatever burden ailed him, but, I never thought I had to save him. If I thought that I needed to do that, I would have. I’ve never been anything but my own person. And, lastly, Scott would tell me to get as far away as fucking possible from someone like Liana, as he did a couple other times to close friends of mine who, in fact, I didn’t do that… and it wasn’t a problem between me and him. It’s just his opinion.
It is Liana Kerzner who is perpetually wrong, and yet, people listen to them… or they did. They has no special insight. Every element there is cold-reading, and fits any other average person’s potential relationship with their troubled father. The problem is that my father and our relationship wasn’t what I call “Hallmark world,” and so Liana, and other cold-readers *always* get it wrong. *ALWAYS* And when I saw Liana not only shaming my father via their distaste of throwing their own words back at them (since they told me they never said them), but then putting words in my own fucking father’s mouth (no one who has ever done that, including me, was ever right, ever), I immediately knew, then and there, it was over.
This is someone who will manipulate your memories, your feelings, your connections, and your guilt (of which I have very little, which is, of course, a big problem for someone as passive-aggressive as Kerzner).
Isn’t it odd that both Mitchell and I just happen to have terrible relationships with our fathers?
I did not, by the way. I had the opposite: I didn’t have *enough* relationship with my father for myself.
By the way, Liana Kerzner talked on the air about how they wouldn’t go to their father’s bedside when he was dying because of how he treated Kerzner when they were growing up.
Or, let’s see…
Liana Kerzner claims that Mitchell was abused in some way, in the least, according to Mitchell. Liana Kerzner is so duplicitous at times in their posting that, who the fuck truly knows. And that’s exactly the point. If Kerzner “never says your name,” or you “don’t have enough followers” they believe, incorrectly, they’re safe.
Of course, I’m also abused, somehow, by either my father or mother, since my mother allegedly taught me to hate women (???). Liana’s right that I was emotionally neglected, but that’s because I*told* them I felt emotionally neglected, so… duh. Also, I’m gay as fuck, and frankly, until 21 months ago, I didn’t give a shit about male-female dynamics other than when either one is abusive.
Since I don’t date, or try to have sex with women, on the whole, why would I ever ‘hate’ them for anything other than their personalities or values?
The answer is, I wouldn’t.
But, here’s the kicker, when you actually *tell* Liana of your abuse, then, oh, then they minimize and belittle it. It’s “oversold” despite the story Kerzner’s using being inaccurate, or it’s “suspect” because the other person seemed decent enough to them, or it’s a “lie” because, well, because you did something they didn’t like.
The last two years (and more) have shown that, when it comes to Liana Kerzner, the only person who can actually legitimately suffer is Liana Kerzner and whoever they deem legitimate that day, like, I don’t know, Bobby.
Everything I post here is true, to the best of my ability. And it has been since I started posting on BlueSky, where I started addressing my prior identification 19 days *after* the cancellation announcement, as opposed to the very next day on Kiwi Farms and Twitter by cornholierthanthou, TransTruthTeller, and Giancarlo Vanzzini.
You know, that account that mentioned Gail Simone out of the fucking blue right after Maus had brought up Gail Simone in a ‘very private’ and “very ugly” fight?
Liana has claimed our conversations about Mitchell were “business,” and that it “turned into a fight.”
Liana, and their naive and under-experienced clique of fans, don’t seem to be aware that business conversations involving a service turning into a “fight” is a really big red flag that the story being told is either missing a big chunk, or is not true.
Liana, being an alleged deontologist, will cite that all the attention should be on me for revealing any of this so brazenly. That I break the rules every time I publish private information like this. Uh… I guess so. The point isn’t that “rules” I don’t even subscribe to are broken. It’s that Liana overstepped and violated my consent, and other people’s consent and confidentiality, and that Liana Kerzner is the one person that has both set this entire thing in motion, and denied it every step of the way.
One of Kerzner’s fans, Per I think, I don’t know, don’t give a shit… anyway, one of their fans offered that when I say “it’s really not a bad thing because…” that it’s gobbledigook just to say, “I’m not *really* a bad person!”
It’s really very simple.
I treat others exactly how they treat me.
So, when someone violates my consent, my privacy, and “throws me under the bus” by Liana’s own husband’s terms, then… what the fuck decency do I owe them not to be willing to do the same if it means uncovering the truth about what’s happening, especially when the truth shows that a lot of people are getting hurt and are going to very likely continue to be hurt?
The solution is not to do that to me, and then, I won’t have any reason to have license, by my own moral code, to do it to you. That’s literally what I subscribe to. I don’t see it as “a necessary evil,” or that I’m a “bad person,” since I don’t believe in “bad people.” It was Liana, and Liana alone, that *ever* said that to me or about me, not me. *Kerzner* brought it up and then acted like I did, like any abuser would that has to make it about that.
I see what I just described as fair. It’s fair when I do it, and it’s fair when someone does it to me. But don’t get all boggled. The fact is Liana did it first, and that matters in this framework. Liana trespassed on my very human dignity, whatever that may be, and set this entire thing into motion.
Not me.
And, I told Liana all about this moral framework at PAX and around PAX. I believe the whole thing was clear enough, and Liana CHOSE to ignore it. They say as much when Liana, being the basic bitch mental health influencer they are, cited Maya Angelou about believing people when it came to their former friends.
Yeah, duh!
Liana Kerzner is ridiculous, and, after reading this, anyone continuing to believe them over me about myself is a moron.