Twitter/X: There is a formal sociological usage of “social marker” as a clue to group identity. Th…

There is a formal sociological usage of “social marker” as a clue to group identity. The important distinction is between: identifying a category, and identifying a unique individual. https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058293779443196158/photo/1

Source: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058293779443196158

Thread posts: 11

There is a formal sociological usage of “social marker” as a clue to group identity.

The important distinction is between: identifying a category, and identifying a unique individual. https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058293779443196158/photo/1

2026-05-23 21:07:32 / 2058293779443196158 / Twitter Web App
Tweet media for 2058293779443196158

I am being capped by X. This is unviable for me.

I can say this: I didn't even realize "social marker" was a specialized "academic" term in the first place. I just thought, from my research, it sounded like a good way to describe what I was describing.

2026-05-23 21:25:42 / 2058298350580244858 / Twitter Web App

It's really that simple.

2026-05-23 21:26:05 / 2058298444046090711 / Twitter Web App

Since X is no longer viable, I'll say this:

At every turn my agency is diminished if not eliminated (again, how does one violate their own privacy?), my voice is erased, my reach restricted, my story reinterpreted, and my abilities ridiculed and feared simultaneously, somehow…

2026-05-23 21:29:31 / 2058299308374687925 / Twitter Web App

rather than simply discuss the issue I've been raising, consistently, with the same language, the same details, the same story, the same sequence of events, at least a dozen times now over the last 18 months.

No. I must be lying because it hurts Liana's feelings.

2026-05-23 21:29:34 / 2058299323411292378 / Twitter Web App

One last thing, to bring it all back around: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058300765496910203/photo/1

2026-05-23 21:35:18 / 2058300765496910203 / Twitter Web App
Tweet media for 2058300765496910203
Tweet media for 2058300765496910203
Tweet media for 2058300765496910203
Tweet media for 2058300765496910203

https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058300987019059275/photo/1

2026-05-23 21:36:11 / 2058300987019059275 / Twitter Web App
Tweet media for 2058300987019059275
Tweet media for 2058300987019059275
Tweet media for 2058300987019059275
Tweet media for 2058300987019059275

It's all the same, and it all still holds exactly the same.

I explained, in detail, the manipulation I was perceiving. I wrote that I thought she'd block me, and I had zero expectation of her coming back. https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058301709404025099/photo/1

2026-05-23 21:39:03 / 2058301709404025099 / Twitter Web App
Tweet media for 2058301709404025099
Tweet media for 2058301709404025099
Tweet media for 2058301709404025099
Tweet media for 2058301709404025099

In return Poppy

1) referred to motives I didn't have that centered her

2) clearly tried to use a boundary as a rhetorical offense, when, those are her responsibility and when it didn't go to her benefit

2026-05-23 21:40:34 / 2058302091765100636 / Twitter Web App

3) put me on blast with symptom diagnostics she can't know and is unethical for her to say and were wrong, complete with a psychological profile, being projection.

And, if you hadn't noticed: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058302753932546104/photo/1

2026-05-23 21:43:12 / 2058302753932546104 / Twitter Web App
Tweet media for 2058302753932546104
Tweet media for 2058302753932546104

We have Liana Kerzner, on record, in a Telegram exchange with Pablo, stating that she told Poppy that my defense against her gish gallop claims were substantial, and that she didn't believe I was engaging in a gish gallop.

Again, I rest my case.

This platform is now unviable.

2026-05-23 21:43:58 / 2058302948309127286 / Twitter Web App

Twitter/X root tweet: 2058293779443196158