Twitter/X: Because it’s extremely unclear who “you,” and “husband,” are since Kerzner refuses to b…

Because it’s extremely unclear who “you,” and “husband,” are since Kerzner refuses to be specific, I’ll state this:

Source: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2058605839045497202

Thread posts: 6

Because it's extremely unclear who "you," and "husband," are since Kerzner refuses to be specific, I'll state this:

2026-05-24 17:47:33 / 2058605839045497202 / Twitter Web App

1. Liana Kerzner and I have *never* once had "professional communications." Ever. Not once. At all. Anything, and I mean *ANYTHING* she shared with me, which, she did, was not "professional," it was "dishing."

2026-05-24 17:47:34 / 2058605840618385555 / Twitter Web App

2. *I* appeared on her actual radio show at some point as well, in an interview I've requested multiple times be removed due to what I believe to be now be exploitation. Not then, but now, given everything that she's done. This was not a "professional" occurrence.

2026-05-24 17:47:34 / 2058605842090618964 / Twitter Web App

3. Anything Liana ever shared with me was not under any sort of confidentiality agreement, and I have the right to share anything said to me outside of any such agreement and to publish my experiences, tell my story,

2026-05-24 17:47:34 / 2058605843688612248 / Twitter Web App

and my thoughts on any person or topic just as Kerzner has done for the past 18 months, except, you know, I use specifics, verbose non-selective facts to give the whole context as best I can, and, well, the truth and only the truth as I know it.

2026-05-24 17:47:35 / 2058605845328596998 / Twitter Web App

Them's the facts. That's just how it is. I have every right to publish and say what I've said.

If Kerzner disagrees, she can pursue it in court. I'd love that. I hope that happens so the truth can then be examined by an authority, which will then pronounce me to have told it.

2026-05-24 17:47:35 / 2058605847669072102 / Twitter Web App

Twitter/X root tweet: 2058605839045497202