I’d Like A Process Of Inference For One Please

I give you this:

(from 3l7jgae7f6i2f)

I love to code, sometimes for 12-13 hours straight. This is who I am. I am not some deranged, miserable manchild male with a loop-de-loop worldview who can’t stand being wrong or called out, who has no spine, and who manipulates people with no regard for their safety. I especially do not …

[EDIT September 11, 2026: Oh, look, I used the word ‘manchild‘ on October 27, 2024. I must’ve been reacting to the Sabrina Carpenter song Liana posted below on October 5, 2025, about a year later.

And why do I say this?

Because when I used the same word, ‘manchild‘ in a comment I left on the video featuring my interview on YouTube:

She used that as an opportunity to post:

And how do I know she’s talking about me?

She says it! Or, she thinks she doesn’t say it because, well, look:

So, she’s talking about *somebody!* In fact, she’s talking about someone Blazen Dragon used to laugh *with* and congratulate me and Liana on making new “friends” (trolls) when we’d dunk them.

Huh.

See, Liana thinks that’s *not* talking abo— let me get into it, and you’ll see.

Uh, when I pointed out that I was identifiable by a process of inference in her cancellation video:

Especially when she uses the words, “Alluded to before,” in the opening, her lawyer has this to say:

You can download this PDF here:

bourrie2Download

…

When, back in reality and not Liana’s imposing fantasy, this is easily shown as false:

I guess Liana didn’t tell Mark Bourrie that part.

I also didn’t go to BlueSky “the next day.”

I related that it was me ~18 days later, WAY past October 5th, and October 6th, which are the dates of the posts on Kiwi arms above. Kiwi Farms may be a shit source, but they’re DATES DON’T LIE.

So, no, Mark Bourrie, it is *NOT* a fact. Absolutely not a fact. Your reasoning is wrong, and it’s wrong because you were set up to fail by Liana Kerzner who “refused” to give you all the information.

We haven’t heard from Mark Bourrie since, by the way. Not a peep.

But I digress.

Remember this from before?

Me using the word ‘manchild’ in a YouTube comment that didn’t even mention a Sabrina Carpenter video or her post was enough for Liana Kerzner to *infer* that I thought she was talking about me. She inferred *incorrectly* which, happens to the best of us. However, when her audience might *infer* that it’s us, they are suddenly incapable by Liana and her lawyers insistence. When I *infer* that she’s talking about me, or commenting on me and my situation and the caricature she’s set up for her audience, then, it’s impossible. She can’t *possibly* be talking about me, and her audience *can’t possibly* know it’s about me.

In fact, she says,

Here’s the episode that *wasn’t about us* (timestamped):

And yet,

Oh, that’s weird.

Her audience was able to *infer* without Liana’s “allowing” them to!

Better tell fucking Mark Bourrie… LIANA’S COUNSEL!

But, remember, if I see this:

And I say, “She’s talking about me!” Liana Kerzner, with a straight face, won’t “allow” me to actually make that inference, AS IF IT’S UP TO HER.

Even her husband Steven mocked me for thinking it was all about me.

Well,

If this little editor’s note doesn’t convince you that Liana Kerzner is full of shit, nothing will.]

3l7jgae7f6i2f

My BlueSky archive has a lot of great shit in it. I know it’s a mess, but I’m clearing it up… see?

There’s some awfully good shit in there.

And yeah, it’s shit, ’cause this is all fucking bullshit I had to slog through for 19 months before the truth came out.

Liana Kerzner lies to her audience, her friends, and maybe herself, imposing a fantasy that doesn’t exist onto anyone and anything that doesn’t play along.