Source: at://did:plc:v2j2g5pdghrwazhbw6gvxtdp/app.bsky.feed.post/3lm4qdnm3qk2y
Uh…
No.
WTF?
I can verify my husband is not a KiwiFarmer.
Any claim he makes can be backed up with evidence.
Neither one of us are interested in attack "vectors." Especially not directed at trans individuals. We support trans individuals and always have.
2025-04-06 05:41:45.923 / 3lm4qdnm3qk2y
The only one with a "vibes" list is… @skunkw0rxx.dev funny enough.
2025-04-06 05:41:45.924 / 3lm4qdqggek2y
I support anyone to be anything they want to be. How could I not? I am an anthropomorph, an animal human much like the popular concept of "furry." Always have been, I did not 'discover it.' I just am! I aspire to present as an anthropomorph at all times, that is, as myself.
2025-04-06 05:41:45.925 / 3lm4qdqrexc2y
There are various barriers, but I will succeed. I call it my existential condition "trans-species" as another term. If that's what I am (and want to 'be') how could I not support anyone else to do the same?
2025-04-06 05:41:45.926 / 3lm4qdqrexd2y
I have criticized people and their behaviors, and they definitely have done the same to me. All of those critiques are no more about them being trans or my alleged hatred of them being trans than theirs are about me being trans-species.
2025-04-06 05:41:45.927 / 3lm4qdqrexe2y
Most of the people that I've had unfortunate encounters with *have* expressed a bias towards my race, my gender, my orientation, and definitely my sanity. They were expressly ableist, sexist, and racist, not to just me, but to my Latin American husband.
2025-04-06 05:41:45.928 / 3lm4qdqrfwm2y
Not one of my arguments or disagreements in my life has centered around anyone's identity unless it was relevant to someone's behaviors. They're all centered around someone's actions, beliefs, or arguments. All of them.
2025-04-06 05:41:45.929 / 3lm4qdqrfwn2y
So, again, who's the one with the "vibes" list and a giant party I'm not invited to?
Not either one of us!
2025-04-06 05:41:45.930 / 3lm4qdqrfwo2y
I'm *so* supportive of this, in fact, that my only criteria for any kind of state intervention, or moral intervention by others (or me) is that someone is being malicious (harming others) or committing crimes.
2025-04-06 05:50:11.110 / 3lm4qspe76g2y
Otherwise, I reserve judgment or action. This includes Scientologists, neo-NAZIs, fundamentalists, furries, vampires, serial killer admirers, queer people, activists, trans people, average 'normal' (hmmmm) people, rich people, homeless people,
2025-04-06 05:50:11.111 / 3lm4qspkheo2y
Communists, capitalists, atheists, whatever. If you're not hurting anyone or committing a crime (or participating or enabling one) then, you're good!
2025-04-06 05:50:11.112 / 3lm4qspkhep2y
I don't think *anyone* has the right to limit someone else's freedom or violate their rights (by, say, taking away their electronic devices or banning them from the Internet) only because they disagree with me.
Freedom!
2025-04-06 05:50:11.113 / 3lm4qspkidx2y
I must clarify my reservation of judgment. I do not mean I reserve judgment on everything they say or do, obviously. I donāt reserve judgment on beliefs or philosophies.
2025-04-06 15:22:44.225 / 3lm5qsj23zc2u
Even if I may find their philosophy abhorrent, such as Nazism, what I reserve judgment on is that specific individualās existence and their identity outside the context of their actions. I judge malicious behavior extremely harshly.
2025-04-06 15:22:44.226 / 3lm5qsj5ej22u
Besides this issue, what other things cause you to describe them as bonkers?
2025-04-12 01:21:51.706 / 3lmlemgjztk2a
ATProto root record: 3lm4qdnm3qk2y