Source: at://did:plc:v2j2g5pdghrwazhbw6gvxtdp/app.bsky.feed.post/3lloqq6hz2k2w
Once again @hellscapewanderer.bsky.social “engages” with us despite, via @vividfaegarden.com’s insistence in her vaguely legal threat, making it “crystal fucking clear” that none of them want to have anything to do. She was “*DEADLY*serious.” We’ve never asked them to leave us alone.
2025-03-31 16:11:29.946 / 3lloqq6hz2k2w


The first sentence of her report summarizes the whole situation.
I guess 4 Skeets is the limit before it becomes a manic and erratic diatribe?
2025-03-31 16:11:29.947 / 3lloqqa54bk2w
I haven’t done a single thing she describes. If I have, she’s free to point out where instead of just throw accusations out there and not back it up. But then she might risk appearing like me.
2025-03-31 16:11:29.948 / 3lloqqa55as2w
Since she doesn’t care about any grievance with anyone I might have, which was obvious from the beginning when she belittled everything I said, then this is all I have to say: I have acted the opposite of erratic, I just haven’t acted the way she likes. I’m actually glad they “stood their ground.”
2025-03-31 16:11:29.949 / 3lloqqa577c2w
I haven’t rewritten a single context that I’m aware of, or erased any of it either. I have decided what I believe to be true, but to make that decision I observe reality rather than bend it. I’ve repeatedly expressed great appreciation for the truth.
2025-03-31 16:11:29.950 / 3lloqqa5b5s2w
Neither of us have made the specific argument over our actions about free speech, and on that one I will say that once again @vividfargarden.com and @hellscapewanderer.bsky.social brought that up first and then decided that was our argument for us, again, as they do.
2025-03-31 16:11:29.951 / 3lloqqa5e3k2w
In my terms I’ve left them alone, but not theirs, which requires never mentioning them ever again or what they did or said to me. I’ve made no attack, which, to me, is lying, misrepresenting, skewing, stigmatizing, and vitriolic inflammatory language, …
2025-03-31 16:11:29.952 / 3lloqqapi622w
but to them it’s describing in great detail exactly what they did which hurts their feelings. Over the last six months it’s become very clear to me, by everyone’s actions, why my innocent question was so dangerous to everyone involved. I’m very glad I asked.
2025-03-31 16:11:29.953 / 3lloqqapk4k2w
I have not manipulated a single thing in my estimation. I don’t require permission to have grievances *with her,* which I’m apparently supposed to leave her out of. I don’t thrive on attention, I don’t have an audience and very little if any attention on me.
Where is it?
2025-03-31 16:11:29.954 / 3lloqqapm322w
She can comment on me, because it’s her, which renders it responsible. But I cannot comment on her, because I’m me, which makes it irresponsible.
2025-03-31 16:11:29.955 / 3lloqqapnzk2w
I’ve actively encouraged everyone to make all the reports they feel they need to make to whoever they need to make it to, so I’m glad she’s finally taking my advice.
What *I’m* sure about is that she’ll read all of this, despite wanting nothing to do with me, and then respond indirectly …
2025-03-31 16:11:29.956 / 3lloqqappy22w
deciding everything about me for me, shame me some more with some choice adjectives, omit important details, conflate different conversations, try to come up with another random angle based off assumptions,
2025-03-31 16:11:29.957 / 3lloqqaprwk2w
and paint herself as an undeserving victim of the consequences of engaging with me and this situation: I talk about them and my grievances *with them.*
2025-03-31 16:11:29.958 / 3lloqqaptv22w
*to do *with me.* I don't know how that happened, I even double-checked it.
2025-03-31 21:18:08.347 / 3llpbuik4wk2n
ATProto root record: 3lloqq6hz2k2w
