Source: at://did:plc:v2j2g5pdghrwazhbw6gvxtdp/app.bsky.feed.post/3lqadootxj22f
I wasn’t going to do this, and just ignore this account given my recent ban for harassment. However, upon reviewing it to consider a mutual block, I discovered this new and disturbing presentation.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.162 / 3lqadootxj22f
I have every reason to believe this account, by its behavior alone, is someone I met ~6 years ago. They live in my town, know what I look like, my full name, date of birth, and exactly where I live. They know what my husband looks like. They know what car I drive. And now it’s “wunk season.”
2025-05-28 13:46:43.163 / 3lqadoqdxnc2f
How am I supposed to take that? And the AI taxidermy head has my eyes photoshopped onto it. How would YOU take that? And how would any of the people I allegedly harassed take that if *I* posted it?
2025-05-28 13:46:43.164 / 3lqadoqdzls2f
They posted most of that information in misleading images publicly targeting me on their account. I already have a thread showing how it’s misleading and that they added a mocking concession in response to my challenge.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.165 / 3lqadoqe3kc2f
It erroneously marks me as the type of person on whom many might be motivated to enact a form of vigilante justice, or turn a blind eye to such, based off of a false interpretation and claim I never made.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.166 / 3lqadoqe5is2f
A claim they cite my former friend on, and one she should know is false since she aged with me it was defaming a year ago in Twitter.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.167 / 3lqadoqe7hc2f
And yet, somehow, despite reporting the following to BlueSky, twice, this account is still up even after I was banned for harassment for 72 hours over a defense of myself most likely instigated by this account.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.168 / 3lqadoqebfs2f
“Desc specifically targets me, linking to a false and misleading post. Blobs contain similarly misleading images previously posted.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.169 / 3lqadoqecf22f
The term wunk is unique to me, suggesting hunting. Taxidermy eyes are my eyes photoshopped. Purposefully targeted my account to report harassment. Escalating situation.”
2025-05-28 13:46:43.170 / 3lqadoqeedk2f
They remain.
I’m punished.
But they keep going unquestioned.
And I’m supposed to think this is dignified, safe, and inclusive, or something.
2025-05-28 13:46:43.171 / 3lqadoqefcs2f
cortinarius.us-west.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atp…
2025-05-28 13:50:29.211 / 3lqadvgfuvs2f
cortinarius.us-west.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atp…
2025-05-28 13:50:29.212 / 3lqadvgipq22f
cortinarius.us-west.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atp…
2025-05-28 13:50:29.213 / 3lqadvgitn22f
cortinarius.us-west.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atp…
2025-05-28 13:50:29.214 / 3lqadvgiyjc2f
cortinarius.us-west.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atp…
2025-05-28 13:51:31.836 / 3lqadxc52522f
Notice the subtleties of the deceptions. I don't like to talk about that paragraph, as it was poorly written. I wish I could go back and write it differently, or not at all, but it is what it is and its distribution is outside of my control. I've addressed it in this thread, one of several times.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.174 / 3lqao6rgixk2b
The oft-quoted paragraph is missing an important larger context (the paragraph before, and the rest of the post). This has not an issue or troubling subject that has haunted me throughout my life, and that was the only time I've ever mentioned it. I am quite regretful.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.175 / 3lqao6rmlcc2b
Given all that…
Notice how "a pedo" is in double-quotes as if those were my words? They weren't. I've never described myself like that.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.176 / 3lqao6rmmbk2b
The account at one point quoted "a small child" to suggest I talked about a small child. I did talk about a small child, but that child *was me.* I didn't write about anyone but me.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.177 / 3lqao6rmmbl2b
I have never described myself as "sexually violent." I wrote that there was "sexual violence," which was a *poor choice of words.* In the end though, *that's* what I wrote, and it does matter.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.178 / 3lqao6rmnat2b
And again, it is written that I "admitted to (COCSA / molesting a child / being a child molester)" but, I never wrote that. I never mentioned another person, a victim, a specific situation, nothing.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.179 / 3lqao6rmnau2b
Every version of that is something someone read into what I wrote, something they imagined and then decided I wrote. The former friend that this account cites *agreed with me* publicly on Twitter that the above claim(s) *were straight-up defamation.* She is engaging in duplicitous revisionism.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.180 / 3lqao6rmnav2b
I wrote in denial, "I have never attacked a small child," but that is discounted despite being very clear. But whatever they imagine from my *very vague* paragraph must be fact.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.181 / 3lqao6rmoa52b
I wrote, "I never confessed to [attacking a small child]," but again, despite it's clarity it's discounted for something imagined. Whatever people think, imagine, or *fear* is more important and regarded as factual than what was actually written and what I have followed up with to clarify.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.182 / 3lqao6rmoa62b
I get that I set myself up for this. I understand that. I don't fault anyone for being wary or disturbed. I'm not asking people to accept me. Whatever they conclude and feel is up to them and I can't do anything about it. Maybe I deserve it for how I wrote it.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.183 / 3lqao6rmoa72b
But, what I don't deserve, or them, are falsehoods. Judge my actions and my words however you want, but the facts are the facts. Your feelings aren't facts. Neither are mine.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.184 / 3lqao6rmoaa2b
Whatever you *want* me to be saying or arguing isn't actually what I'm saying or arguing, especially if you can't point to where I specifically said any of it. Interpret it however you want, but, don't turn around and say that I admitted to that interpretation or put it on me. That's not fair.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.185 / 3lqao6rmoab2b
In this current cultural (and political) climate, combined with my identity (mentally ill, disabled, gay and furry; I fursuit in public) these are very important points. With people recording themselves for an audience everywhere it's no longer ridiculous to worry…
2025-05-28 16:54:40.186 / 3lqao6rmp7j2b
that someone will be motivated to draw attention to themselves in a vigilante effort against the person they *want* me to be, because, who would defend that?
They know what I look like, what my name is, where I currently live and I can't do anything effectively about it now.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.187 / 3lqao6rmp7k2b
Besides the clout-obsessed, this administration isn't exactly friendly to the truth, or to individuals like me regardless of what I wrote.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.188 / 3lqao6rmp7l2b
With the proper motivation, at any time, for any reason, under any excuse, the 'secret police' might decide that I'm inconvenient as well, on a personal level or a community level. If you doubt this, try flipping off or honking at a cop.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.189 / 3lqao6rmp7m2b
And one last layer is that the individual who I have every reason to believe this account to be is known for escalating situations to the point of *manufacturing* wrongdoing on the part of his victims.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.190 / 3lqao6rmp7n2b
He did it to someone I knew *to me,* and it's not outside reason that he'll do it to me if he continues to be told 'no,' and not get his way. It's "wunk season" after all, right?
2025-05-28 16:54:40.191 / 3lqao6rmp7o2b
If that sounds ridiculous, take a look at this video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cly3…
These things happen. These people exist. They get through life 'just fine' until they're caught. They aren't obvious. You can't pick them out in a crowd. Life doesn't work like that, it's not a movie.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.192 / 3lqao6rmp7p2b
But Asher, isn't this the results of what *you've also been doing this whole time*?
It saddens me a great deal that people would see what I've written and still think this. I'd like to think they *haven't* seen what I've written, and many haven't really, but some have and still push this.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.193 / 3lqao6slcph2b
It's this idea of, "well, now you know what it feels like to be harassed, sucks to be you!"
Well, the issue with that is this… it's another subtle manipulation to frame me as having done the *exact* same thing as the account in question, and that doesn't hold up.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.194 / 3lqao6sldop2b
I've never threatened another person, even subtly, by suggestion, or insinuation. There was 1 misunderstanding that I cleared up immediately ("sacrifice"). I've never silenced anyone.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.195 / 3lqao6sldoq2b
I've never impersonated another person in messages to triangulate or stir the pot. I've never lied, revised the past, or altered my story. And, I've never manufactured something that wasn't there.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.196 / 3lqao6sldor2b
What I've written about, my specific situation, my specific observations, and my specific interactions, have never been unfounded accusations, purposefully vague, or simply ad hominem character assassination.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.197 / 3lqao6sldos2b
What I *have* done is assert my right to talk about what people have said, the lies they've told about me, what has happened to me, how they've treated me, what I know to be true, my experience, and accurately identified them at every step.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.198 / 3lqao6sldot2b
What I have done is hurt people's feelings by telling what they did.
And you may think that's terrible, and that I deserve all of this. And that's fine, you do you. I don't need your pity.
But I will say that it's incredibly harmful, unfair, and doesn't make the world a better place.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.199 / 3lqao6sldou2b
Many of the people I talk about have done *exactly* the same thing, but in unseemly ways that appear to be more socially acceptable (mostly because they seem ineffective and harmless, even though they aren't).
I don't aspire to be superficially ineffective. Blech.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.200 / 3lqao6sldov2b
They have demanded I "never talk about them," and "leave them alone," even threatened me if I don't appease them (*DEADLY*) with legalities and protective orders (that *would* harm me). Those aren't boundaries.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.201 / 3lqao6sldow2b
I have *not* contacted them, that's a boundary. But, whatever I have to say about them to anyone or in any place I can publish that *isn't false* is something they have no right to control. That's my "harassment."
2025-05-28 16:54:40.202 / 3lqao6sleo62b
I got punched in the face (lied about, maliciously in my opinion), and now, I'm not letting my aggressor just walk away because that was part of *their* private life to be protected. I won't shut up about it like they want.
That's it.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.203 / 3lqao6sleo72b
I have opinions. I have stances. I criticize people for my own purposes. It's *never* simply because I 'hate someone' or I'm 'mad at them.' I can't say the same for those demanding I toe the societal line so they can continue their abuse.
2025-05-28 16:54:40.204 / 3lqao6sleoa2b
*AGREED* not aged
2025-05-28 17:47:11.755 / 3lqar4oz3sk2w
ATProto root record: 3lqadootxj22f