Reader
Please don’t describe me as considering myself Liana’s “former friend.” I shall quote myself: “I consider Liana a dear friend I respect…”
[EDIT September 10, 2026: This was on October 24th, 2024, not even one full month later after Liana Kerzner violated my privacy by imposing a “transparency” to backers that I *NEVER* consented to have, and blamed me for project failures for behavior I *NEVER* consented to be mitigated or toned down because it was a project I was *NEVER* a part of, no team member, no silent collaboration (not even with my husband), nothing. I *NEVER* consented to any of this and Liana Kerzner, who is decidedly NOT MY FRIEND or deserving of my respect, has bitched, moaned, cried, and thrown tantrums because I keep publishing the evidence I have that directly refutes what she says after months and months of giving her a chance to be fair-minded, open, and honest. She wasn’t and now, *now* she has the audacity to cry “consent consent privacy privacy.” If Liana wanted privacy and comfort rather than violation and cruelty, she should try to actually provide privacy and comfort rather than violation and cruelty. On top of that, someone who’s lied about doesn’t owe the liar privacy to disprove the lie. Someone taking back what was stolen isn’t ‘stealing it back.’ These are just 2 instances where deontological Kerzner’s “two wrongs don’t make a right” is wrong, because it’s not “two wrongs,” it’s justice. If Kerzner wants *less* of what she constantly complains about, she should try giving *less* of it out.]
Data
{
"$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
"createdAt": "2024-10-24T21:47:46.920Z",
"embed": {
"$type": "app.bsky.embed.record",
"record": {
"cid": "bafyreidfhr4e25iijuqgtjsk73433agyjep6bsenpgqfp6ju5tm5gk57wq",
"uri": "at://did:plc:v2j2g5pdghrwazhbw6gvxtdp/app.bsky.feed.post/3l7bvzvgvqb2p"
}
},
"langs": [
"en"
],
"text": "Please don't describe me as considering myself Liana's \"former friend.\" I shall quote myself: \"I consider Liana a dear friend I respect...\""
}