Social Posts | Something Strange; Everything True

Source: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2059715837641302464

Thread posts: 3

There's nothing to address that hasn't already been addressed.
2026-05-27 19:18:18 / 2059715837641302464 / Twitter Web App

I advise you to take a gander at number 3 of my top 10 phrases, which I published in June 29, 2025, almost a month after my 8,000 post 8-month long BlueSky was permanently suspended, and presumably erased from the Internet until I announced I'd backed up *hours before,* as if I was anticipating it as I had just posted I was in danger, the *first* of such ignored pleas:
"If you have to listen twice, it's because you keep hoping to hear what you want."
Anchored link below:
https://asherwolfstein.com/hello-world/#if-you-have-to-listen-twice-its-because-you-keep-hoping-to-hear-what-you-want
2026-05-27 19:22:33 / 2059716911236338160 / Twitter Web App

I'm not going to apologize for you not getting your way when I've spent 18-months explaining why I don't agree with what you've said about the situation, me, my motivations, my diagnoses (which have never included narcissism you unqualified influencer), my moral philosophy, and everything else I deemed relevant in between, going *gphpghgghghght* incomprehensibly, according to you, on video, with thousands and thousands of carefully chosen words. I'm not going to apologize for you unwillingness to read it, consider it, or acknowledge it. And I'm not going to apologize for not having empathy or understanding for your alleged trauma-responses that aren't, as *you've* described them, or your alleged loss of identity after being shown that you're abusing me, my narrative, and my wellbeing in an 18-month campaign of mental health stigma. I don't apologize to my abusers, which, you chose not to believe when my impersonator wrote those shit sentences on the end that even my *therapist* of 2 sessions said, "I've listened to you for 3 hours and I can already tell you I wouldn't believe you wrote those sentences,* and instead decided it was more authentic because it was "written from a place of guilt" that *you* decided I suffered from *for me,* just like how you didn't believe me the first time when I told you all of this in-person at PAX as you admitted publicly, in one of your episodes, citing Maya Angelou in line with the rest of your unoriginally reheated "content" I've had the displeasure of listening to every week, and then turned around, continued not to believe me, and made it *my* responsibility because I'm a "terrible person." This ain't flying anymore Liana. Everyone is seeing it for exactly what it is, and I'm not going to apologize just so you can feel "safe," anymore than you ever took into account my trauma, my trauma triggers, my condition, or my struggles in any benefit of any doubt, unlike what your husband, Ed the Sock, praised you for on Kickstarter when it came to his "silent collaboration" and his "mistake" resulting from, his own words, deep depression that was being *mismanaged* by meds, which, to me, sounds an awful lot like an unacceptable lack of impulse control. I'm not going to apologize for modulating my emotional reaction when you took a phrase, "the trolls were right," which I *didn't* stand by because it was written in unreasonable anger, the only time you witnessed any of it, and it was over text, which, you have also said no one can "scream" with except when it's at you, and then, for some inexplicable reason, at least at the time, took that as an offense and insult about you when it was *never about you.* It was never, ever, about you. That fight *wasn't about you.* This whole thing stems from a queer Twitter slapfight that your faux progressive phobic busybody white suburbia tone-policing ass decided she needed to save people from because it was *really* about YOU the entire time.
It *REALLY* wasn't about YOU at all. YOU made it about YOU. And I'm NOT going to apologize for it because now you feel bad, and your self-image is hurting.
Well, now you know what it feels like I guess.
As you said recently in a http://NotTherapyShow.com episode earlier this year:
"Better they feel it than me," and like I've always said:
I treat people exactly how they have decided to treat me.
You didn't believe that, you should've had the basic decency to do so, and now you're crying about your own choices. You've always known I do this, you watched it, you approved, participated, and praised it, it's in the chat logs. There is *nothing* unique about any of this, as I've written for 18-months, that point, and all the others, repeatedly, half-a-dozen or more times. I've trounced you at least a dozen times by now, and you don't know it yet because you never bothered to look at it past the first couple sentences.
Not my problem. Not my injury. Not my victim. Not my guilt. And not mine to apologize for.
You and all your toxic brainwashed friends should be apologizing to me for how you've repaid my honest, authentic, and affectionate friendship that I tried to give you.
2026-05-27 19:41:13 / 2059721605597806763 / Twitter Web App

Twitter/X root tweet: 2059715837641302464

Source: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2059888271266820135

Thread posts: 1

Dude, you creepy as fuck. We really really do not need your help. Obviously I can't control what people do, but, I respectfully ask that you stop posting about us, stop pursuing this, for fuck's sake stop writing backwards because that's super creepy, and stop talking like you're weirdly concerned about courts and corporate entities because you're not if you're typing backwards.
Also, please note, that they registered 33 hours ago and in that short span of time have 1 follower. That follower just happens to be http://mitchtanenbaum.bsky.social, someone who popped up on our radar in the last couple months, but not because of social media activity (actually we were *surprised* when we discovered this account on social media), but because of *website traffic,* you know, that thing I've been recording to some degree for my own safety? Well, here's some information about the ominous activities of an *anonymous* third-party that doesn't seem to ever be considered when it comes to things like journalistic integrity:
Since my website re-re-re-launched or whatever, it's received, 1,660 visitors, 6,416 views, and 2,470 sessions. These numbers do not reflect every version over the last 18 months.
Since it's re-re-re-launch on December 8, 2025, the website has serviced a fair number of searches, including the following within the last several months:
"cseke"
"Mitch"
"Asher █████ Holley Exhibit K7c stalking dox death threat"
"Asher Holley"
"destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice Exhibit NN04"
"doxxing Pablo YouTube Exhibit K"
"Liana Kerzner has lied to you for sixteen years 404 destruction of evidence Exhibit GG05"
"Mitch Tanenbaum"
"mitchtanenbaum"
"subpeona Boulder education"
"http://x.com Twitter doxxing Exhibit NN04 HB22-1041"
Ummm, these are highly concerning to say the least, but you might notice three in there that are relevant now. As I've said, we didn't know http://mitchtanenbaum.bsky.social even existed before we discovered search queries for him almost a month or more later. They almost slipped right by our notice.
I saw them and said, "Who the fuck is Mitch Tanenbaum?" and Maus said, "… WHO?" as if he was at Frida Claxton's funeral…
So I looked him up.
Turns out he's into cybersecurity! And he lives in Loveland! Oh, how convenient! And so, eventually, we ended up *CALLING* Mitch Tanenbaum who informed us that he has no idea about that account, and that his usual course of business, if not exclusively, involved thousands of dollar at minimum for large organizations and enterprises.
Isn't that just … WEIRD?
See, the person we *believe* is most likely behind a lot of triangulation, for months, as I've said is Louis Michael Cseke. Louis was our former friend years ago in *Fort Collins* who claimed he lived in Estes, and even California, where, I don't know, he might observe something on a street corner, and who we had to *go to the police over.*
And the anonymous person who is most likely Michael, as I refer to him, realized that I can see all the traffic to my site after he, in our theory, was trying to troll my comments posing as "Jeffry Epstein" and I fired back his IP addresses (all VPNs). And so, what better way to possibly intimidate us, this truly random anonymous troll (who I recognize is truly anonymous, and so, I do not know with any factual certainty it's Michael, which is part of the problem regarding my safety), then to search for random ass weird term combinations that involve courts, subpeonas, alleged charges, document numbers, case numbers, things we've been accused of doing, all of which started to appear, as far as I can currently tell, *AFTER* the comment troll (which I eliminated) realized I could see the traffic in detail.
I have NO IDEA whether any of these relate to anything that actually exists, and I haven't really figured out how to find out in a reasonable way. I'm not sure what anyone thinks they'll find at Boulder, since I have like, 1 document myself and that's probably the most that survives after literally a quarter of a century. I've never seen these exhibit numbers, case codes, document codes, and I believe they're made up. I've NEVER been involved in any destruction of any evidence that I'm aware of, that isn't a single one of the charges I received that are now expunged because of a deferral I completed when I was 18 involving CU, and so on…
Creepy shit dude, and I see you, and so you should probably stop.
Notice how it's this ungodly dark red on a dark background that even *I* wouldn't put on my UI because I need fucking glasses?
We. Do. Not. Want. Your. Help.
Anything you post beyond this will be without our consent. That doesn't mean you can't do it, but it's not with *our* consent. We request you also leave Liana alone, she's already blocked you.
This is me nipping this in the fucking bud.
I see a lot, all the time, and I'm responsive as fuck, so, stop. Stop trying to do this. It will all eventually came back to your doorstep anyway, as you can now see. I will find you and connect everything I've discovered you've done to you. Just ask Giancarlo Vanzzini.
My eighth grade class didn't crown me "King of Thermonuclear War" for nothing (true story).
2026-05-28 06:43:29 / 2059888271266820135 / Twitter Web App

Twitter/X root tweet: 2059888271266820135

Source: https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269770574909734

Thread posts: 8

Here's the most recent comments I made on Reddit.
In this one, I want to be clear that, it's not that I am dead set on making sure everyone *knows* this is happening exactly the way I see it. That's not the point at all.
It's very possible that the explanation is that the OP's friend simply doesn't understand the realities of being 18 and homeless, or is trying to help and is very concerned because they're familiar with how the OP can be with money, or maybe they're trying to stress that being in a safe room is better than "food," it's really hard to say. That's not the point of my comments.
The point of my comments in this one is that the commenters I'm replying to are focused on the OP, so much so that they are even speculating and debating on the OP's responsibilities and obligations to this person, their "dubiousness," their choices, even that things are getting "twisted" but only to benefit the OP's friend, and even asserting that she *should* provide proof with photos and receipts.
Maybe, but, I notice that almost none of the commenters in *that* thread are all that concerned about OP's friend, who gave $100 in cash, and is now saying what I consider to be concerning things due to her original intentions about the $100. The don't seem to even consider that the large sum isn't, say, solely on OP but also that, if her friend was so concerned, why didn't the friend just buy the hotel room? They don't seem to even bother pointing out how incredibly judgmental, aggressive, even boundary-crossing the OP's friend's statements are at the end, chalking it up to just 'miscommunications,' or 'misunderstandings,' that resulted in 'frustrations' all aimed at being entirely the fault of the OP.
I am aware that a good amount of the users on Reddit are middle to upper-middle class, and there may not be many that have experienced homelessness, especially at a young age.
I can tell.
My replies are my responses as I see these comments just… not improve, up to the point another commenter counters me with "but it WAS theirs." Well, yeah, until they GAVE it to OP!
Shaming the OP in a situation where there are so many unknowns instead of just reinforcing that boundaries clears a lot of this up, particularly in the scenario I offer, is… unacceptable. And not even bothering to question the person handing out $100, as if the suspicious part is still on the OP? Yeah.
To me, that language near the end, it sounds like someone handed money to someone and then expected to control their life.
2026-05-29 07:59:25 / 2060269770574909734 / Twitter Web App

At first… I didn't read all the text, because the screenshot itself weirded me out. … https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269775796703243/photo/1
2026-05-29 07:59:27 / 2060269775796703243 / Twitter Web App

But then… I did, because, what are these comments? https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269780649550076/photo/1
2026-05-29 07:59:28 / 2060269780649550076 / Twitter Web App

https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269785707872626/photo/1
2026-05-29 07:59:29 / 2060269785707872626 / Twitter Web App

WHAT are these comments? https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269790938226711/photo/1
2026-05-29 07:59:30 / 2060269790938226711 / Twitter Web App

https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269796764123488/photo/1
2026-05-29 07:59:32 / 2060269796764123488 / Twitter Web App

WHAT ARE THESE COMMENTS!? https://x.com/asherwolfstein/status/2060269802292211734/photo/1
2026-05-29 07:59:33 / 2060269802292211734 / Twitter Web App

In the last screenshot, the EDIT is *mocking* their unique focus on the OP where they're spending quite a bit of time writing these long sorta rambling thoughts with little dots of social issues and allowance discourse, still pondering, hmmmm… and yet, in *this* thread, 'cause I didn't go further, they didn't even *consider* that maybe something might not be quite right, something untoward might be happening with the more secure friend of the OP handing out $100 as a GIFT and then crossing the OPs boundaries big time when they realized the OP made their own decisions.
Nope, it's, she got $100 and she's trying to help someone so, she's trustworthy, give her maximum benefit of the doubt, nothing bad here, if there was any confusion it's the young poor homeless girl's fault.
2026-05-29 08:01:34 / 2060270310943752419 / Twitter Web App

Twitter/X root tweet: 2060269770574909734

Accessibility

Display Settings

Archives: Social Posts